<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GNOME RoadMap for 2.22, 2.24, and the Future</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tombuntu.com/index.php/2007/11/07/gnome-roadmap-for-222-224-and-the-future/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tombuntu.com/index.php/2007/11/07/gnome-roadmap-for-222-224-and-the-future/</link>
	<description>News, Tips, and How-Tos for Ubuntu Linux</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 21:09:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://tombuntu.com/index.php/2007/11/07/gnome-roadmap-for-222-224-and-the-future/#comment-2384</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 03:44:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tombuntu.com/index.php/2007/11/07/gnome-roadmap-for-222-224-and-the-future/#comment-2384</guid>
		<description>Matt Brubeck + marnanel,
Thanks for the info regarding compositing and Metacity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt Brubeck + marnanel,<br />
Thanks for the info regarding compositing and Metacity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marnanel</title>
		<link>http://tombuntu.com/index.php/2007/11/07/gnome-roadmap-for-222-224-and-the-future/#comment-2383</link>
		<dc:creator>marnanel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 02:39:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tombuntu.com/index.php/2007/11/07/gnome-roadmap-for-222-224-and-the-future/#comment-2383</guid>
		<description>&quot;Are desktop effects ever going to be included in GNOME by default?&quot;

Yes, if we can get the compositor stable (and it needs to be really, really stable). People are working on it. More people working on it would be nice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Are desktop effects ever going to be included in GNOME by default?&#8221;</p>
<p>Yes, if we can get the compositor stable (and it needs to be really, really stable). People are working on it. More people working on it would be nice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Brubeck</title>
		<link>http://tombuntu.com/index.php/2007/11/07/gnome-roadmap-for-222-224-and-the-future/#comment-2373</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Brubeck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 22:12:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tombuntu.com/index.php/2007/11/07/gnome-roadmap-for-222-224-and-the-future/#comment-2373</guid>
		<description>Metacity does have a compositor, but it&#039;s disabled by default because it is not yet mature enough for general use:

http://svn.gnome.org/viewvc/metacity/trunk/doc/compositor-control.txt?view=markup

There&#039;s been some new work on it in the past year, but I think compiz has attracted most of the effort.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Metacity does have a compositor, but it&#8217;s disabled by default because it is not yet mature enough for general use:</p>
<p><a href="http://svn.gnome.org/viewvc/metacity/trunk/doc/compositor-control.txt?view=markup" rel="nofollow">http://svn.gnome.org/viewvc/metacity/trunk/doc/compositor-control.txt?view=markup</a></p>
<p>There&#8217;s been some new work on it in the past year, but I think compiz has attracted most of the effort.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

