<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Don&#8217;t Apt-Get, Aptitude</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tombuntu.com/index.php/2007/08/12/dont-apt-get-aptitude/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tombuntu.com/index.php/2007/08/12/dont-apt-get-aptitude/</link>
	<description>News, Tips, and How-Tos for Ubuntu Linux</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 11:59:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raphaël Hertzog</title>
		<link>http://tombuntu.com/index.php/2007/08/12/dont-apt-get-aptitude/#comment-161248</link>
		<dc:creator>Raphaël Hertzog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2011 08:17:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tombuntu.com/index.php/2007/08/12/dont-apt-get-aptitude/#comment-161248</guid>
		<description>Besides apt-get autoremove that other commenters already noted, I would like to add that there are important differences in the way apt-get and aptitude manage dist-upgrades. So aptitude is not always superior to apt-get and in fact the Squeeze release notes recommended the usage of apt-get because aptitude failed to work reliably.

You might also be interested by my article &lt;a href=&quot;http://raphaelhertzog.com/2011/06/20/apt-get-aptitude-%e2%80%a6-pick-the-right-debian-package-manager-for-you/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;apt-get, aptitude, … pick the right package manager for you&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Besides apt-get autoremove that other commenters already noted, I would like to add that there are important differences in the way apt-get and aptitude manage dist-upgrades. So aptitude is not always superior to apt-get and in fact the Squeeze release notes recommended the usage of apt-get because aptitude failed to work reliably.</p>
<p>You might also be interested by my article <a href="http://raphaelhertzog.com/2011/06/20/apt-get-aptitude-%e2%80%a6-pick-the-right-debian-package-manager-for-you/" rel="nofollow">apt-get, aptitude, … pick the right package manager for you</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: onan</title>
		<link>http://tombuntu.com/index.php/2007/08/12/dont-apt-get-aptitude/#comment-12413</link>
		<dc:creator>onan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 21:01:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tombuntu.com/index.php/2007/08/12/dont-apt-get-aptitude/#comment-12413</guid>
		<description>how far back in the past do you live to still perpetuate such an old thing. apt-get features the autoremove option to remove any leftover dependencies since 2006.

besides, comparing apt-get and aptitude makes absolutely no sense as aptitude is a frontend to the apt tools. it would like comparing dselect to dpkg.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>how far back in the past do you live to still perpetuate such an old thing. apt-get features the autoremove option to remove any leftover dependencies since 2006.</p>
<p>besides, comparing apt-get and aptitude makes absolutely no sense as aptitude is a frontend to the apt tools. it would like comparing dselect to dpkg.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Pope</title>
		<link>http://tombuntu.com/index.php/2007/08/12/dont-apt-get-aptitude/#comment-195</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Pope</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 17:03:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tombuntu.com/index.php/2007/08/12/dont-apt-get-aptitude/#comment-195</guid>
		<description>You can of course use &quot;apt-get autoremove &quot; which will remove the package _and_ its dependents just fine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can of course use &#8220;apt-get autoremove &#8221; which will remove the package _and_ its dependents just fine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Azrael Nightwalker</title>
		<link>http://tombuntu.com/index.php/2007/08/12/dont-apt-get-aptitude/#comment-194</link>
		<dc:creator>Azrael Nightwalker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 08:56:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tombuntu.com/index.php/2007/08/12/dont-apt-get-aptitude/#comment-194</guid>
		<description>Try wajig - it can do much more than aptitude. Just see the output of &#039;wajig commands&#039;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Try wajig &#8211; it can do much more than aptitude. Just see the output of &#8216;wajig commands&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christoph Langner</title>
		<link>http://tombuntu.com/index.php/2007/08/12/dont-apt-get-aptitude/#comment-193</link>
		<dc:creator>Christoph Langner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 08:42:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tombuntu.com/index.php/2007/08/12/dont-apt-get-aptitude/#comment-193</guid>
		<description>In my opinion it is a bad thing to recommend aptitude. Using aptitude forces you to not use any frontends of apt any more since you break aptitudes own database when you mixe apt-get based frontends and aptitude. Since apt-get has the option &quot;autoremove&quot; aptitude is obsulet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my opinion it is a bad thing to recommend aptitude. Using aptitude forces you to not use any frontends of apt any more since you break aptitudes own database when you mixe apt-get based frontends and aptitude. Since apt-get has the option &#8220;autoremove&#8221; aptitude is obsulet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)

Served from: tombuntu.com @ 2012-02-08 00:32:38 -->
